pallas_athena: (Default)
Supertitle translation for opera is one of the things I do, and since I've just finished another marathon job (Wagner's Siegfried) I figured I would write about the process a bit. Following these general principles has resulted in supertitles which have been mentioned positively in reviews, as well as compliments from audience members.

For many in the audience, the supertitle is their first point of contact with dialogue, character and story. So your supertitle must:

- convey the emotion of the moment

- convey the 'voice' of the character who is speaking

while also:

- being concise (nothing too wordy-- you want the audience to spend more time watching the singers than reading the titles)

- not getting in the way of the action (nothing too prosaic or too purple)

AND it has to fit on two lines at the font size being used.

Lineation is important: verse dramatists and comics letterers know this. The principle is "one thought, one line." Or musically, if practicable, "one phrase, one line."

Ideally, line breaks should come at an intuitive point in the structure of the music or the sentence. Your audience will read at various speeds, but reading will be quicker and comprehension more intuitive if you follow this rule.

For example: in this last job I was given a set of someone else's titles from 2014 to work from. I ended up making alterations to almost every single slide, many of which involved lineation.

For example, I was given:

Out of the bush came a bear, who
listened to my tune


which I edited to

Out of the brush came a bear
who heard me playing


Just a small change, but it helps the title make intuitive sense when read.

Similarly, if the character is expressing one thought broken up into two short phrases separated by a breath or a rest, the supertitle should also break the thought into two lines.

Thus, Mime's first line could be written as:

Utter torment! Toil without end!


But the singer sings, and the audience hears, two distinct phrases. So the title should be on two lines:

Utter torment!
Toil without end!


Finally, a word about timing. First of all: the titles need to appear at a speed at which they can be easily read. You can get away with slightly faster changes by using less text per slide, but that's still risky: ideally you want titles that someone who reads more slowly can keep up with. I supertitled a Meistersinger von Nürnberg in 2019; the finales of Acts I and II involve large numbers of people all singing different text at high speed. At such times, all you can do is provide a summary, picking the bits of text most important to the scene and the story, and hoping for the best.

There are also certain moments when a change of thought requires a new slide, even if the line could all fit on one. That way, the audience discover the new thought at the same time as the character. In Act II of Meistersinger, when Pogner is wondering whether to go visit Sachs, he says:

Shall I? But what for?
...Better not


It wasn't until the dress rehearsal that I realised "Better not" needed its own slide, which gave a little more feeling to the moment when Pogner realises he's become distanced from his old friend Sachs.

Similarly, in comedy, if there's a joke being told, your slide should line up with the punchline so the audience discovers it as the singer says it. Ideally that title should be short and snappy, for ease of reading and comic impact.

If the original is funny, so should the title be-- but the singer should get the laugh.

Supertitle translation does call for your writerly skill, and will test your ability as a dramatist-- but your writing must always support the story and artists onstage. Beware of the temptation to impress with your cleverness or poetic flair: it's the director's production, not yours.

I write this as someone who's been supertitling for nearly twenty years. It's always someone's first time seeing the opera, and your titles can be pivotal to that person's engagement with the story. That's our greatest reward.
pallas_athena: (Default)
So, social media seems to be in a state of collapse. It's strange, because this blog is a port of my old LiveJournal, and I'm old enough to remember when Facebook took the wind out of LJ's sails back at the dawn of the millennium.

Facebook is now Your Dad's Internet; no one who's on it wants to be there. They're just there because it's their single point of contact with certain people who aren't online anywhere else.

Twitter (X, whatever) under the Muskmelon is even more of a cesspit than it was under Jack Dorsey-- and let's not forget how utterly crap he was. That's why I won't be joining Bluesky. And I don't trust Zuckerberg further than I can throw him, so Threads can go fuck itself.

None of the other sites (Spoutible, Hive, Post, etc.) have gathered enough traction to be viable. Mastodon isn't user friendly enough to attain Twitter's former reach, and probably isn't aiming for that in any case.

In any case, I've increasingly had the feeling that putting effort into writing on a site like Facebook or Twitter is pouring wine into a jug with no bottom. Both sites give you no meaningful access to your own archive. If I'm writing-- however trivially-- I'm creating a body of work. I want to be able (ideally easily) to search it, reread it, cross-reference it. To be able to refer back, and refer one's readers back, in a way that's impossible on Facebook and troublesome on Twitter.

...All of which brings me back here. Here fewer people are likely to see what I write, but in a way that feels rather freeing. I noticed on LJ that the bigger my Friends list grew, the less I felt I could say. Now that nobody's listening, perhaps I can allow myself to talk.

And my past is there, for better or worse (often worse). Searchable and taggable. I'm tempted to go back and delete some entries, or leave notes on them saying look, here is some evidence that my past self was trash in many ways. If I haven't done that, it's because there's a lot of trash here, and only one pair of weak arms to shovel it.

Blogging, forsooth. Everything old is new again. We'll see if it sticks.

Postscript: A bit later, I ate my words and joined Bluesky. It's been okay so far. Still keeping an eye on it.
pallas_athena: (Default)
Speech given at the 57th annual Nebula Awards, in acceptance of the Kate Wilhelm Solstice Award on behalf of Petra Mayer, presented by Amal El-Mohtar

(The ceremony can be viewed here)

Thank you, Amal. What a wonderful tribute.

This can only be a pale shadow of the speech Petra would have given you. She looked forward to the Nebulas every year, and she loved coming here and hanging out with her favourite bunch of people (and discovering new favourites with each passing year). I wish she were here to speak to you herself. There’s no substitute for her voice.

When you lose someone you love, sometimes you raise your head from the grief and shock, look out the window and think “why hasn’t the world stopped?” And you wish for a moment that everyone had known how amazing this person was.

So sinking into the abyss of Twitter in the aftermath of Petra’s tragic, sudden, early death, the consolation I found was that in her case, people did know. Even people who’d only heard her voice on the radio had a sense of her personality, and the authors and journalists and people from the book world among whom she’d lived and worked were dealing with their grief by raising her a cairn of words as only they could. So to everyone who felt Petra’s loss and wrote something, even a few words, at that terrible time, thank you. It helped.

It’s hard to think of Petra being gone. Petra was a force of nature, a tsunami of enthusiasms and brightly coloured plastic jewellery and baked goods and Doctor Who and Art Nouveau roses and Buster Keaton movies and elaborate costumes and loud singing and creative swearing and you could almost forget that you were in the presence of the doyenne of NPR Books, Petra Mayer of the razor-sharp mind and keen editorial eye, marshal to an army of reviewers and voice heard by millions for all her years on the airwaves.

Critics, especially in national media outlets, are to some extent gatekeepers; and editors even more so. But Petra was a gatekeeper who flung wide the gates, and would have ripped them off their hinges if she could. From the beginning, she sought out not just the authors she knew and loved, but the overlooked and the underpromoted. She sought out the work of authors and critics from marginalised groups— she couldn’t bear the thought of institutional bias robbing us of those stories, those voices. She widened her mandate to include not just SF and fantasy, but comics, horror, mystery and romance. And if she couldn’t fit in a review of your book, or if she read it after publication, it still might turn up in one of her Best Of lists or reader polls, or in the great work that drove her to distraction every year: the Book Concierge (now renamed Books We Love).

Whether you were an author or a reviewer, Petra was the person you always hoped would read your work. Petra had the book journalist’s talent for speed reading— she devoured books. But she savoured each one, and each particular blend of flavours would remain in her amazingly retentive memory.

As a reviewer, you would send Petra your work and it would come back better and clearer. She would discern your meaning through the layers of obfuscation and overthinking, and she would knock away your excess verbiage like the stone obscuring Excalibur.

Everyone here knows the hazards of making a profession of something you love— but in Petra’s case, that love never wavered. The world of American letters was lucky to have her— and she would have been even more of a presence had she lived to old age— but if she were here accepting this award right now, I know she’d say she was the lucky one. How many teenage nerds grow up to work with their icons? and to be admired by them? She loved every moment. She loved your work, and she loved you.

So, Petra would want me to thank all of you for this award tonight. She would want to thank Jeffee, Kate and the Nebula board. She would want to thank National Public Radio, all of her colleagues at NPR Books, and each and every one of her reviewers. She would give heartfelt thanks to her family, especially her parents, Elke and Jeff, and her longtime platonic life-partner Josh Drobina.

On behalf of the journalist, editor, reader, writer, and force eleven nerdicane that was Petra Mayer, I know she’d be overjoyed to accept this award. She would have longed to party with you afterward, but be assured that wherever you gather, she will be there in spirit. Thank you all.
pallas_athena: (Default)
If you are called on to give a speech at the Nebula Awards, don't forget to:

-- notice at the last moment that the cat is sitting in front of the carefully positioned photo of your deceased friend

-- shoo the cat off the windowsill, knocking over the TARDIS mug

--set everything up again in the few seconds before you go live

--start giving the speech you were still editing 5 minutes ago

--forget to introduce yourself

--panic and cut the first paragraph as being too self-indulgent

--realise that the second paragraph doesn't make sense without the first

--improvise, cover your ass frantically

--somehow finish the speech

--where the hell is Petra when I need an editor/ person cooler than me/ person to get me a goddamn drink when I embarrass myself in front of the great & good of the science fiction world

--I miss you Petra
pallas_athena: (Default)
Petra and I have been friends since around age 10. In middle school we fought a lot — largely because school was awful and we were in a continuously horrible mood for about 8 years. But by 9th, 10th and 11th grade we had settled into a friendship distinguished by public weirdness, extravagant modes of dress, sitting in the Bishops’ Garden playing guitars, singing, burning incense and eating crystallised ginger— the more fiery the better. And then, of course, there were comics.

We had this routine where we would go to Big Planet in Bethesda and buy comics, often from Jef, the nice (and extremely patient) fellow behind the counter. We’d dance up and down the aisles of colourful covers, calling to each other— have you read this? Ohmygod you HAVE to read this! I’m not letting you leave without this! Look, I’ll lend you mine, but you have to read this! (In retrospect, it’s not surprising that when Petra found her ideal career, it turned out to be, essentially, that.)

And then we would go around the corner to the Tastee Diner, order fries and chocolate milkshakes, dip the fries in the milkshakes and read the comics. In those days we read mostly indie comics, because those were sufficiently cool for us to be seen reading. We read our way through Sandman, Transmetropolitan, Preacher, Desert Peach, Finder and many other titles which are now problematic. It was only later that we discovered the joy of superheroes. As mature adults, we were ready to embrace the joys of fighting crime in colourful tights. (Anyone who’s ever read a 1980s X-Men comic will recognise a certain kinship with Petra’s fashion sense.)



We joke about how, in the X-Men and other superhero comics, death is a revolving door. But what it really is, I think, is a form of theatre. A favourite character will die so that the writer and the artist can give them that moment, and so that they can show all the other characters reacting, put those emotions on display. And then, after a certain interval, it becomes evident that you can’t really tell the story without that character, that the superhero team isn’t the same without them, and the fans are discontented— so a writer will find a way to bring them back. And that panel, the panel where you first see that character again, is always as beautiful as the artist can make it. Sometimes, if you’re really lucky, it can feel like light is emanating from the page.

And God, I wish Petra were only comics dead. Because right now, a lot of us are feeling as though the story can’t continue without her. And the various teams she was a member of are feeling distinctly less super. All our powers are dimmed and lessened in her absence. Without her, who’s going to want to read the book? What editor okayed this decision? And what kind of douchebag author would write it in the first place?

Petra didn’t really give bad reviews, but she would definitely deem this situation unworthy of inclusion in the august archive of NPR. She would read anything, but her least favourite genre was where everything is terrible for no reason.

But I wish Petra were only comics dead. Because then, in some future adventure, we might hope to see her again. Perhaps in the lair of a mad scientist— always a popular choice for resurrections (and very Petra). Or in some far-flung corner of the cosmos, or an alternate universe— someplace with a lot of Kirby dots. When we least expected it, there she’d be, and we would fall to our knees in disbelief and weep for joy.

Even if it were one of those comics where she came back as Evil Petra in a cool new costume and extravagant eyeliner, somehow convinced that she must use her unholy powers to destroy us all, we would know what to do. We would play her some Magnetic Fields or some 80s rap, or put on an episode of Bake Off, or point over there and say “Hey, is that David Tennant?” And she’d immediately forget to be evil and go “ohmygod, where?!”

And you’d get that scene which we get over and over in comics, but we still can’t get enough of: that scene where a character’s turned evil somehow and there’s a big dramatic fight scene, and then their best friend or someone who’s been on their team for a long time will grab their arm and say “This isn’t you. I know you, let me tell you…” and the character is recalled to themselves by that recollection, that voice. And that’s absolutely what a friend is and does. A friend is someone who can tell your own story back to you when you’ve forgotten it. And Petra was such a great friend to so many of us, she knew so many of our stories and carried them with her. And even though we all know we’re bit parts at best, Petra could make you feel like a protagonist.

So what we have to do for now and later on, and maybe for the rest of our lives, is: to live our stories as though Petra were reading them. Because maybe, somewhere, she is. And when we arrive where she has gone, as we all must, the last thing we’d want is to have bored her.

Meanwhile, today, we should tell the stories we have about her. Tell the funny ones, the embarrassing ones— the ones that would make her want to come back from the grave to tell us to shut up— the ones where she’s great (which is all of them). Because, as she carried parts of all our stories, so we all carry parts of hers, and we always will.



I’d like to close with a short verse by Edna St Vincent Millay, one of the few poets (I think) capable of capturing the emotion of a moment like this:

For you there is no song,
Only the shaking
Of the voice that meant to sing; the sound of the strong
Voice breaking.

Strange in my hand appears 

The pen, and yours broken.
There are ink and tears on the page; only the tears
Have spoken.
pallas_athena: (Default)
[Twitter thread; inspired by hearing a friend do the Muse of Fire speech in a fundraiser for the Globe, here.]

***********

In online Shakespeare, this speech (the Prologue to Henry V) becomes something else. Shakespeare says "This is a play: we'll do our best but we can't be the real thing. So please just watch the stage and imagine the reality."

But now we need to imagine the theatre too.

In the speech, there are repeated size comparisons between the enclosed Globe and the French battlefields

("Cockpit": cockfighting was held in even smaller spaces than the Globe. This engraving is 1808 but gives you an idea of what Sh was thinking of. Note that the cockpit, like the Globe, is circular)

The Chorus talks about how small the Globe feels-- but it was certainly larger than the rooms most of Shakespeare's audience lived in, then as now.

So the Muse of Fire speech feels personal, because it acknowledges the smallness and confinement of the space we're now in, and speaks to our desire for vaster spaces. It says we *can* have those spaces, if we imagine them.

And the speech then asks us for an act of *collective* imagination.

By emphasising the smallness of the Globe, Shakespeare makes his audience physically feel closer together.

(They were already pretty close. Today's Globe has a capacity of around 1400. Shakespeare's had similar dimensions & capacity about 3000. When sold out, they were packed in, welded together. Think mosh pit)

Today's productions often split the Chorus up among the ensemble. But given the text, we can assume the prologue was spoken by one person, addressing many, asking them (asking us) to collectively imagine something greater.

It starts by bringing out points of commonality: inviting us to look around at the place we're in. "This wooden O", "the girdle of these walls", "this unworthy scaffold". So everyone, groundlings and gentry, is looking around at the same time at the same walls enclosing them all.

And then the Chorus says: here's what I want you to imagine instead of these walls. Imagine huge armies, vast battlefields, warhorses.

"Into a thousand parts divide one man"

Where you've just invited 3000 people to imagine *one thing*, making them a unity

The Chorus then says (essentially): I'll be your guide; I'll be the one to let you know what to imagine. So when those 3000 people see the Chorus, they're now primed: they know they're going to be asked to imagine something together.

(Later, Henry will assume this function too)

So now, today, hearing this speech, we *feel* the smallness & confinement of the spaces we're in. When we hear "the girdle of these walls" we look around ruefully at our untidy desks, messy kitchens, worn sofas.

(But we still look around, at the same moment)

Today we're another thing Shakespeare's audience weren't: we're apart. Maybe we're watching the speech with a few flatmates or family. Maybe we've snatched a moment alone to watch it, shut into our rooms, resigned to hitting Pause when the next crisis happens

But the speech is still one actor addressing many, inviting us all collectively to look at where we are, then imagine something else. Something different. Something greater.

And when we hear those words, wherever we are, we think of those things.

And the things we imagine are the things we need, just as human animals. We're confined and need space. We're apart and we need togetherness.

(I don't know about you, but I miss being part of an audience like the desert misses water-- even with the occasional stresses involved)

So 400+ years from when it was first spoken, the Muse of Fire still speaks to us, now more than ever.

I hope theatre comes back. And music, and all the arts. In the meantime, please (if you can) support them and the people who make them.

And listen, watch, imagine.

****************

Acting For Others: https://actingforothers.co.uk
Help Musicians: https://helpmusicians.org.uk/support-our-work/make-a-donation

And please support your local theatre, music and performance companies and spaces, many of which are supporting furloughed staff as far as they can through this crisis.

And if you know an unemployed artist, please be kind to them. We've just seen our entire industry disappear, with little hope of it coming back any time soon.

It's great that so many performances are being shared online, but in most cases it doesn't pay
Just... I don't know. Maybe we can collectively imagine something else, something better, to come out of all this.

I hope so.

And I know the arts, and artists, will be a part of that. It's what we've spent our lives doing, and we're not gonna stop.
pallas_athena: (Default)
After this evening's (excellent) Messiah, the conductor and I got talking to one of the ladies who run things at the church, an older lady named Carolyn who had been singing in the first soprano section. She was telling me which museums I should go to in DC; she mentioned the Museum of African American History and the Native American museum. Then she said "And if you get to the Natural History Museum... in there, they have a lunch counter that used to be in a store called Woolworth's in North Carolina. I was arrested there while we were holding a sit-in, and I spent the night in jail."

Carolyn's story below )
pallas_athena: (tarot)
My good friend, author and singer [livejournal.com profile] simonsatori, has posted some intriguing thoughts on atheism, which has given rise to some thoughts on my part.

You should go read his post, first of all, which ends thus:

If god doesn’t exist [...] then I will not just ‘… go and enjoy my life’. I will suddenly live in a meaningless universe. Not only will there be no hope or chance of any higher power guiding or interacting with us but I will have the sure knowledge that there never was and never will be and the infinite universe becomes a smaller and finite one. This is not my definition of enjoyment.


I agree with many of Simon's fundamental points, including that Richard Dawkins is a bit of an arse and that smug evangelical atheists are just as annoying as smug evangelical anything else.

Here's where I differ, though: a universe devoid of deities would not, to me, be meaningless. It would still contain wonders aplenty, and it would still beckon us to search industriously for any theories or systems underlying it all. It would still be expanding, challenging us to understand that. It would still contain the light and radio waves emanating from distant stars, quasars, pulsars and all their relations. It would still contain billions of other planets and their satellites, of which (even within our own solar system) we have sent probes to the surfaces of only two (plus two moons and two asteroids.) It would still contain whales, elephants, great apes and other social animals whose ways of communication and interrelation are largely unknown to us. It would still contain rocks whose crystalline structure the human eye finds elegant, and water droplets whose prismatic refraction the human brain finds beautiful. It would still contain us and our insanely complex biology, about which a hell of a lot still remains to be discovered. It would still contain the silky black cat with white feet currently attempting interspecies communication by arranging herself on my lap and purring. It would still contain the human affection I feel towards the aforementioned black cat, as well as the urges which would prompt other humans to kick her, or kill and eat her. And my desire to punch them in the face.

In short, a definitely-godless universe would still contain all the things previously thought to be evidence for the hand of an omniscient creator, only now they would be evidence that the universe is an amazing, fucking awe-inspiring place. Perhaps, in the absence of gods, we would begin to personify that universe which reveals its secrets so slowly and dangles its veiled areas so tantalisingly before us, daring us to discover it and cheering us on as we do. Within a generation or two, humans might not even miss the concept of God-- or might have redefined it along the foregoing lines.
Further thoughts below )
pallas_athena: (Default)
Every fool's an April fool
For foolery's in flower.
There's sugar in the salt shaker
And corn oil in the shower.

That heavy breathing call was me
Made to your office phone;
I cling-wrap-trapped the toilet bowl
For you and you alone.

The whoopee cushion sighs my love
Wherever you are seated;
And when you come to share my bed
You'll find yourself shortsheeted.

Oh every fool's an April fool
So take my hand and sing:
For you may hope to spring the trap,
But never trap the Spring.
pallas_athena: (Default)
The title of this post is Sir Christopher Wren's epitaph, but I think it applies equally well to Steve Jobs.
I was going to make this post a personal history. I was going to write about going to the computer store and learning to use the 128k Mac that became our first home computer. (After that, upgrading to a 512K seemed like a huge deal.) About the art I did with MacPaint, and the music notation I learnt by working with ConcertWare, and the term papers I wrote, and the dumbass games-- the games were the best. [livejournal.com profile] speedlime had one called Despair where there was no score and no timer: the only object was to kill the little stick-figure people that milled aimlessly around your screen. Typing that now, it seems kind of sad, even though I remember how cool it was to discover that if you froze them and then struck them with lightning, they'd explode.

Then I read the obituary thread on MetaFilter, and I realised my story is far from unique. It's my generation's story, at least in America, and possibly Europe too. We were, at the age of anything between five and sixteen, shown a computer that we instantly, instictively, fundamentally understood-- and it made geeks of us. We loved it.
Seriously. The old mainframes and such were sinister things that you could use to contact aliens or hack into the Pentagon or zap the entire world, but the friendly little computer became a much-loved character in a newspaper comic strip. A Mac would never have declined to open the pod bay doors. (Although it might have given you one of those annoying little bomb messages. Remember those? Yeah, they sucked. And OS9 in general was a pile of shit, but let's not dwell on that.)
I know I'm not alone in this, because a few years ago I visited [livejournal.com profile] badmagic's apartment for the first time, glanced over at the stubby rectangular monitor on a shelf in the corner and cried out "Holy crap! Is that a 128k?" Joe let me know that I was not the first person, nor even the first woman, to say this upon entering his apartment. How many of us hang onto our old PC boxen? The old Mac wasn't even designed to be that beautiful, and yet it's iconic in a way that no other computer of its time is.

One man isn't the company, and Jobs didn't singlehandedly create all those great machines. But he is inextricably linked to all the pieces of hardware that inspire such irrational affection in geeks and others like us. That's our link to him, and that's why the passing of a CEO none of us met feels strangely personal.

Belief in an afterlife is irrelevant, really, because by the time it's going to matter to us we'll be past caring-- but the thought of one is such a good metaphor that there's no way an English-degree wanker like me could pass it up. So, in the metaphorical probably-nonexistent afterlife, I hope that there's a vision of perfection of form and a place to find out all the answers.

Alternatively, there's IKEA. (April Fool's column from 2005, a horribly irreverent note to end on-- but one has to end somewhere.)

Adventures

Sep. 9th, 2011 07:04 pm
pallas_athena: (Default)
(I started this post on my last day in Venice.)

It's been a very intensive week of rehearsals, and my way of relaxing has been to slip away in the breaks and have adventures. Luckily Venice is a very adventuresome city. Usually I'd end up in a mask shop, exercising my lousy Italian by talking with the maker.

Most good mask shops have someone sitting in there finishing masks during the day, to drive home the point that these masks are authentic and not imported. My particular passion is Commedia masks in leather, which only a few people make; most artists concentrate on the more highly decorated Carnival masks, which are traditionally made in cartapesta-- something between plaster-of-Paris and papier-mâché.

The first shop I staggered into was Artifex, up by Fondamente Nuove. The makers are a husband-and-wife couple, Giancarlo and Federica; Giancarlo was in the shop when I went. We had an excellent talk about eighteenth-century geekery and the history of Commedia characters. He also recommended two museums, Ca'Rezzonico (devoted to the eighteenth century) and Palazzo Mocenigo (the textile and costume museum). I bought an Arlecchino mask from him; a friendly face which pleased me. Arlecchino, the Harlequin, is traditionally shown with a bump on his forehead, as are some of the other servant-class characters. In the case of the less intelligent Pedrolino, said Giancarlo, the bump is the mark of a beating by his master; but Arlecchino's name comes from the same root as Hellequin and Erlkönig, and his forehead bears the stump of one of his horns from when he was a demon.

Speaking of demons, the best shop for fucking creepy masks is La Bottega dei Mascareri, just on the Cannaregio side of the Rialto. That maker did the masks for Eyes Wide Shut, and his shop is full of empty-eyed puppets and clowns that leer down at you from every side. He's a superb artist, but I actually couldn't stay there long because I was so creeped out.

The shop of Alberto Sarria is a tiny trove of mindblowing beauty. I was initially drawn to his leather commedia masks, which are things of beauty (he has many photos of troupes of actors wearing them), but his plaster ones are also made with great care and finely decorated. I bought a Capitano from him, which was my big expenditure this trip; only the aftershock of that kept me from also buying EVERYTHING else in the shop, which was so full of amazement I hated to leave. Alberto also has a real eye for how a mask fits, and if it doesn't suit you he'll tell you, which I found helpful.

Today's adventures involved the costume museum at Palazzo Mocenigo, and finding the best lemon granita in history at Gelateria San Stae. Oh yes. I'll be sad to leave this city.
pallas_athena: (Default)
Books about Venice I have read and liked:

Nonfiction:

A Venetian Affair, Andrea di Robilant
In the attic of the family palazzo, Robilant found and decoded a stash of 18th-century love letters which form the nucleus of this book. The intertwined lives of the two illicit lovers, Andrea Memmo and Giustiniana Wynne, take the reader from Venice to Paris and finally to London. A lovely snapshot of eighteenth-century Venetian society, guest-starring Casanova. Speaking of whom:

Histoire de ma vie, Giacomo Casanova
Probably mostly nonfiction, and such a fantastic read you don't care.

A History Of Venice, John Julius Norwich
A bit drier than his three-volume history of Byzantium, but still worth reading. A thorough history of the city from the founding to the fall.

City Of Fortune: How Venice Won and Lost a Naval Empire, Roger Crowley
Currently reading this. The author is an expert on naval history, and he chronicles the era of Venetian mastery of the seas starting from the Fourth Crusade. Good to read in tandem with Norwich; well written with a nice sense of narrative.

Fiction:

The Passion, Jeanette Winterson
This is the book that made me want to visit Venice, and the book I took with me when I finally did. The female Venetian protagonist, Villanelle, is a spellbinding narrator; the male French protagonist, Henri, a cook in Napoleon's army, is more of a pathetic figure, and his sections of the book aren't as much fun. Worth it, though.

Consuelo: A Romance of Venice, George Sand
Opera singers, composers and spooky latter-day Hussites: it's like she wrote it with me in mind. Our heroine is an intrepid mezzo-soprano who starts out as a penniless orphan with a good heart and a fine voice as her only assets. If you're not a music geek, you might find this book boring; if you're a singer, you'll find it riveting. Only the first third or so of the book is set in Venice; Consuelo then takes off across Europe accompanied by the young Joseph Haydn. And what of the enigmatic Count von Rudolstadt? What indeed.

Scherzo, Tad Williams
Any book whose narrator describes himself in the first chapter as "debollocked" is okay by me. Yes, our hero is an operatic castrato and keen observer of the lifestyles of the powerful... which comes in handy when there's a murder mystery to solve. Well-written, sexy and funny as all hell, with ample footnotes referring to books that don't exist. Guest-starring Voltaire and Casanova (again. Is there any book set in Venice in which he doesn't appear?)

...And of course, I'd never miss an opportunity to link back to my own Venetian carnival story. Feel free to throw fruit. Just no pineapples, is all I ask.
pallas_athena: (Default)
From Tristram Shandy, vol. IX, ch. viii-ix, by Laurence Sterne

I will not argue the matter : Time wastes too fast : every letter I trace tells me with what rapidity Life follows my pen ; the days and hours of it, more precious, my dear Jenny! than the rubies about thy neck, are flying over our heads like light clouds of a windy day, never to return more ---- every thing presses on ---- whilst thou art twisting that lock, ---- see! it grows grey ; and every time I kiss thy hand to bid adieu, and every absence which follows it, are preludes to that eternal separation which we are shortly to make. ----

---- Heaven have mercy upon us both!

Now, for what the world thinks of that ejaculation ---- I would not give a groat.


Tristram who? )
pallas_athena: (Default)
I would be commenting on the recent News Of The World/News International kerfuffle, but [livejournal.com profile] webofevil is already doing a far better job. Short version: Newspapers have narrow profit margins; closing the News of the World will cost Murdoch nothing, and launching the new Sunday edition of the Sun will cost him pocket change. (Hell, it might even go into short-term profit-- a miraculous state for a newspaper.) The real prize is the BSkyB deal, which looks set to go ahead: proof, if proof were needed, that no matter how rank the cesspit in which Murdoch stands, he can always get Parliament to clean off his shoes. With their tongues.

But let's get to the real story: the imminent release of the next volume of A Thingy Of Thingies, AKA The Knights Who Say Fuck, AKA George RR Martin's ongoing shag-maim-destroy-and-piss-on-the-ruins party.

If you haven't read these, don't start: going by the evidence, it's going to be at least five years before the next book. But for those poor souls who've started and therefore must finish, here's the very thing you need: a handy and clever drinking game. Of course, you could just start drinking on Page 1 and keep on chugging till the pain stops, but then you might pass out and drool all over your lovely new book. Far better to undertake the necessary brain-soaking in a responsible manner, regulated by the following terms:
In the Game of Drinks, you win or you die )
pallas_athena: (Default)
On Thursday evening, I went to hear some Beethoven string quartets at the Wigmore Hall.

This is a bit of a departure for me. If I'm at the Wigmore Hall, I'm normally there to hear lieder or other vocal music. But my mother's in town, and she loves the wild-haired deaf guy, so we got tickets for the Artemis Quartet's show. On the menu: op. 18 no.6 in B flat; op. 18 no. 3 in D; op. 130 in B flat with the Grosse Fuge.

I first heard the late Beethoven quartets in the autumn of my very first year in Britain, at the house of an English tutor who was helping me prepare for the Oxford exam. I'd asked my friends what this tutor was like, and they said "He basically is Chaucer." So I rang the doorbell and was met by, essentially, the Franklin, with a floridly pink face and a shock of tousled white hair. He offered me a drink-- and insisted when I demurred, a marked contrast with every single American high school teacher from my past.

This chap did have a reputation for constant inebriation-- but he was a mellow drunk, and generally cheerful, so it was cool. He knew I was a classical-music sort, so after our study sessions he'd get out vinyl records of the late Beethoven quartets, and he'd hand me the score to follow-- he knew them all by heart-- and we'd listen to them. His very favourite was opus 130, and I still remember how lovingly he pronounced the words "alla danza tedesca", the heading of the fourth movement ("in the manner of a German dance").

I had hardly thought about those evenings until I glanced at the programme from my seat in the Wigmore. There, again, was alla danza tedesca. The esteemed Chaucerian tutor is, of course, long dead; I don't think I properly grieved for him until now, or thanked him nearly enough while he lived.

And only now do I have the years, and the regrets, to understand what those Beethoven quartets are saying to me.

(A coda: I knew I'd heard the melody from the alla danza tedesca movement used as shorthand for "posh people dancing" in the soundtrack to... a film? A Jane Austen TV series? I couldn't place it, until I finally realised that it's the music for the ball scene in the Firefly episode "Shindig": an elegant touch by series composer Greg Edmonson.)

Not cricket

Jan. 8th, 2011 07:42 pm
pallas_athena: (Default)
Looking back on it, yesterday's poem seems like a lazily obvious choice. Anyone know any better cricket-related poems?

Also, I should confess that I really hate Henry Newbolt. This is not entirely Newbolt's fault (though his tendency towards horrible sub-Kipling bombast doesn't help.)

I fucking loathe Newbolt largely because of the guy who introduced me to his work.
A tale of relationship horror lurks below )
pallas_athena: (Default)
I probably won't be able to post tomorrow, so here are my advance Halloween links for your viewing ?pleasure?.

When I was a schoolkid, I (like all my friends) had the shit scared out of me by a book called Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark. Thanks to a post on MetaFilter today (whose every comment is along the lines of "I remember that, oh god") , I learned that the illustrations that horrified me so are online for all to see. Galleries One, Two, Three.

I reread some of the Alan Moore Swamp Things recently and yes, they are still as fucking disturbing now as they were during my teenage years. I mean, it's Moore, so there are the philosophical ones and the psychedelic ones and the ones with John Constantine... but the straight-up horror ones still fragment your rational mind and leave what's left screaming, knowing the vultures will come eat it and there's nothing it can do.

Also, the really gory deer-butchering verses of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight have come up just in time for Halloween over at [livejournal.com profile] gawain_project.

On a less frightful note, there's a good article on the BBC's website about people who decorate their houses extravagantly for Halloween. This is mostly a US phenomenon: I remember a couple of houses like this in the neighbourhood where I grew up, and I remember thinking it was the coolest thing ever. The article makes the excellent point that Halloween in the US is basically about personal expression, which people are a lot less shy about there than here.

A UK friend with whom I was talking recently expressed satisfaction that Bonfire Night is still holding out against the inroads Halloween is making into Britain. It is easy to see the two holidays as competing-- but I do rather love the osmosis that seems to be occurring between them. The political backdrop of Bonfire Night highlights the anarchic side of Halloween: the misrule that comes with the masquerade. And Halloween's shadow casts Guy Fawkes in a supernatural bogeyman role, one of the malign spirits to be feared and gleefully propitiated.

Which is as much as to say: Trick or treat?
pallas_athena: (Default)
It's certain that fine women eat
A crazy salad with their meat...

W B Yeats, A Prayer for my Daughter


Last night, I made my favourite summer salad. Seriously, this is summer in a bowl. It sounds incongruous but tastes divine:

-Cubes of watermelon
-Pieces of fresh tomatoes
-Leaves of basil
-Crumbs or cubes of feta cheese
-balsamic vinegar (The secret ingredient that ties all the flavours together)
-a splash of olive oil
-black pepper

And as a bonus, a piece of silliness I randomly posted to MetaFilter a year-and-a-bit ago:
Your own personal cheeses )

Why?

Feb. 22nd, 2010 07:25 pm
pallas_athena: (Default)
Typing "why" into my browser's Google search window currently yields the following suggestions:
why do men have nipples
why are black people so loud
why is the sky blue
why can't i own a canadian
why is my poop green
why did i get married too
why do dogs eat poop
why are people posting colors on facebook
why do cats purr
why did the chicken cross the road

Obviously these are all questions that need answers, so once I finished clutching my head and going "What!?!?" I thought I would employ my superior knowledge and resolve these matters once and for all.
All shall be revealed )

If anyone has any further insights into these burning questions, then the world demands that you post them. Thank you.

Profile

pallas_athena: (Default)
pallas_athena

January 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 08:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios